More stories on current events that shake-up America. “Well heck! It’s only the truths, If I don’t say it, then who will?”

The Marc Chamot Report Headline Animator

Addthis Sharing Gadget

Monday, June 28, 2010

From Smart Ass to Jackass; the Joe Biden Foot in Mouth Disease & Scott Brown More Popular than Obama in Massachusetts Polls Show:

From Smart Ass to Jackass; the Joe Biden Foot in Mouth Disease & Scott Brown More Popular than Obama in Massachusetts Polls Show:
By Marc Chamot

One thing’s for sure, Massachusetts is very happy with their new Republican Senator Scott Brown. New polls show, he’s more liked than President Obama and over their other liberal Democrat Senator, John Kerry.

A new Boston Globe poll showed that Senator Scott Brown, R-Mass., is more popular than both Senator John Kerry, D-Mass., and President BarackObama among Massachusetts voters, despite Massachusetts usually being a strongly Democratic state.

According to the poll, 55% of Massachusetts voters hold a favorable opinion of Brown. Kerry, on the other hand, has 52% favorability while Obama has 54%.

When broken down by party, 79% of Republicans view Brown favorably, while 55% of Independents also have a favorable view of him. Among Democrats, a surprising 42% have a favorable view of Brown.

What is perhaps most surprising about the numbers is that Brown won the seat after the passing of Senator Ted Kennedy earlier in the year. Kennedy was a Democrat and extremely popular among Massachusetts voters. But then again, everything’s going right for Republicans. 


But I can’t say much for our president and much less for the imbecile we elected as vice president. General McChrystal was absolutely right about Joe Biden, "‘are you asking about Vice President Biden,' McChrystal says with a laugh.’Who's that?'" "'Biden?' suggests a top adviser.’did you say: Bite Me?'"

Absolutely, we’ve got another MORON in the White House. When Joe Biden was asked to lower taxes by a business owner, his immediate reply was; don’t be a “smart ass.” There's no professionalism in this office, we've GOT a belligerent and mouthy USED car con-salesman as U.S. Vice President.

When it comes to paying higher taxes, we know where the Obama administration’s mindset is in, not for us taxpaying folks.

Vice President Joe Biden has done it again, this time over the weekend at a Wisconsin custard shop.

When Biden asked Scott Borkin how much he owed him, the manager of Kopp's Frozen Custard in Glendale, Wisc., joked: "Don't worry, it's on the house. ... Lower our taxes and we'll call it even."

Later, Biden circled back and said: "Why don't you say something nice instead of being a smarta-- all the time?" Joe Biden calls Wisconsin man a very slightly bad word

Vice President Joe Biden committed a major "gaffe" when he joked around with a guy at a frozen custard shop in Wisconsin last Friday.

When Biden asked the manager of the custard store how much he owed him, the manager said, "lower our taxes and we'll call it even."

Then, later, cameras caught Biden saying to the gentleman: "Why don’t you say something nice instead of being a smartass all the time? Say something nice." And the manager laughed. Because Biden was joking around. And the manager told the local news that Biden was "very nice."

The constantly Drudge-baiting LA Times newsblog promises: "You will hear about Vice President Joe Biden's trip to the Wisconsin custard shop many times over the course of the next five months." If you do, it is because people whose livelihoods depend on attention from Drudge or Andrew Breitbart have a vested interest in making things like these into controversies.

(The manager is already under attack from the liberal media. Specifically, Washington Post staff writer Dan Kois is attempting to smear and discredit this heroic small business manager by saying he was a jerk as a boss.)

Kingston 4 GB Class 4 SDHC Flash Memory Card SD4/4GBET

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

They Never Learn: New British Budget; Cuts Welfare & Boosts Taxes, Fails to Solve Skyrocketing & Runaway Public Employees Wages, Pensions & Unions:

They Never Learn: New British Budget; Cuts Welfare & Boosts Taxes, Fails to Solve Skyrocketing & Runaway Public Employees Wages, Pensions & Unions:
By Marc Chamot

A quick note about General Stanley McChrystal; I’m quite surprised that liberals and conservatives are on same pages of rages towards an American general, who questioned about inept tactics being used to manage a war.

“Here’s the guy who’s going to run this f-ing war, but didn’t seem very engaged.”

“The President of the United States is its commander in Chief, under our constitution; every general must obey him, no matter how many stars he wears.”

I really don’t CARE what they believe, In my sincerest opinion, I truly believe when it COMES to the lives of our fine FIGHTING men and women, a war that is very badly run and managed, generals of any rank, have absolute rights to question higher authorities and their leaders about life-endangering orders, and it’s a moral duty to take action if they don’t want to listen. 

British Chancellor of the Exchequer, what-ever that is in my language, George Osborne, unveiled sweeping emergency budget for Britain, combining severe welfare cuts and tax increases, to help them out of their deficit crisis.

Unfortunately for the British, this isn’t going to work. There's one BIG aspect of the plan still missing, taking on their unions and finding austerity solutions for skyrocketing public employees’ wages and pensions for their GREEDY government workers.

I guess, they saw the chaos happening in Greece and they didn’t want history to repeat itself on their home turf.

This only proves one thing folks, politicians everywhere and even here in the States; don’t HAVE the cohones, GUTS, or the WILL to go after these taxpayer guzzling “gangsters.” 

See full Story Here: Britain's budget cuts welfare, increases taxes Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne unveiled a sweeping emergency budget on Tuesday combining severe spending cuts and some tax increases in Britain's deepest fiscal retrenchment since the early years of Margaret Thatcher's rule.


"Yes, it's tough but it's also fair," Osborne told Parliament, promising that the budgetary measures would protect the least advantaged. "This is the unavoidable budget. I am not going to hide hard choices from the British people."


He added: "The crisis in the euro zone shows that unless we deal with our debts there will be no growth," forecasting that the British economy would grow over the next five years by a maximum annual rate of 2.9 percent in 2013 compared to 1.2 percent this year. He said the government would make spending cuts totaling 17 billion pounds, about $25 billion in U.S. currency, more than had been planned by the former Labor government over the next five years.


Osborne said Britain's welfare costs had risen over the last 10 years to 192 billion pounds from 132 billion pounds, an increase of 45 percent. He announced a three-year freeze on benefits received by parents for raising children, limits on subsidies for public housing and a new way of screening people receiving state benefits for disabilities. Promising accelerated efforts to raise the retirement age to 66, he said the measures would save 11 billion pounds in welfare spending by 2015.


To howls of protest from opposition legislators, Osborne also announced an increase in value-added tax on a wide range of goods and services to 20 percent from 17.5 percent beginning January, saying the measure would raise 13 billion pounds in revenue.


He said his priority had been to "make sure that the measures are fair" so that the "richest pay more than the poor." Osborne promised help for low-income families and for retirees living on state pensions whose monthly payments would henceforth be in line with the overall wage average.
"Over all, everyone will pay something," he said but the poor would pay less than the rich, who would face higher capital gains taxes. "Prosperity for all - that is our goal," he said.


He also announced a levy on the balance sheets of British banks - a measure to raise 2 billion pounds. "This was a crisis that started in the banking sector and the failures of the banks imposed a huge cost on the rest of society," he said.


Osborne's address had been anxiously awaited by a nation that, in the wake of the debt crises in other European countries such as Greece, Ireland and Spain, has been steeling itself for cuts in public services but has by no means accepted that it must make sacrifices.


"I think it will be a very hard sell," said David Kynaston, author of a recent social history of Britain in the austere 1940s. "It will only work if people see that the pain is equally inflicted. We are a very different society now - more individualistic and less willing to listen to exhortations."

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Cap & Trade Agendas Failures: Jobless Keep Rising & Persistent Layoffs; Obama/Democrats Have No Solutions to Jobs & U.S. Economic Woes:

Cap & Trade Agendas Failures: Jobless Keep Rising & Persistent Layoffs; Obama/Democrats Have No Solutions to Jobs & U.S. Economic Woes:
By Marc Chamot

Polls for nationally and state elected political offices are showing Republicans getting steeper gains going into the Midterms, while President Obama’s own jobs approval ratings have dropped even further down the Richter scales.

His usual wrong side of the fences populists’ issues is hurting President Obama big time. Being on the wrong side with healthcare, Arizona’s immigration and border problems, jobs killing Cap and Trades, incompetent energy policies and lack of jobs creations are all hurting Obama and Democrats at the polls.

A new Rasmussen poll is showing the president at 42% from a higher 46% a week ago. His disapproval ratings are at its highest levels, up to 57% and practically sixty-percent of the nations aren’t happy at all, with this president’s job performance over all.

It now seems like his own base has turning against him too. That’s very bad news for Democrats looking to stay in power after the Midterms and for Obama’s re-election prospects in 2012.

But the bottom line folks, this president and his bands of Democrats, have no solutions for turning our bad jobs situations around.

It’s obvious that these Cap and Trade policies, first enacted by California and some other states, they not only are detrimental to jobs and businesses, they are killing their economies, tax bases and jobs.

Obama and Democrat’s solutions are simply pumping more declining taxpayer moneys, into a mortally bleeding open wound, which will not resolve or solve the ongoing jobless problems.

So many times I have written on my blogs about possible solutions and they still go unheard. Actually, I’m pretty bored repeating myself; I’m just sitting here, enjoying myself, while writing about it, and watching the Democratic Party comedy shows quickly developing and collapsing.

There is NO DOUBT Democrats have NO REAL open solutions to the nation’s collapsing jobs structures.

The United States is currently leading the world as the most unemployed for the past four years and which, has had the most jobs losses compared to any other nation around the world since 2006. 2006, does it ring a bell to you? That was the year when Democrats took complete control of the U.S. House and Senate from the Republicans.

I told you people that Democrats and current Republicans don’t have real fixes for American jobs woes. Democrats want to keep pushing jobs killing agendas, while Republicans sit on the sidelines, with no real solutions of their own.

Until these politicians decide to assert more control of world’s markets, those that keep flooding into our country, and protect us from cheaper foreign government subsidized products, mainly those coming from China, and then we’ll see something. When they DECIDE to protect our own markets, industries and WORKERS, from imported foreign workers and outsourcing to foreign competitions; maybe we’ll see a sea of change.

New jobless claims up sharply as layoffs persist
The number of people filing new claims for jobless benefits jumped last week after three straight declines, another sign that the pace of layoffs has not slowed.

Initial claims for jobless benefits rose by 12,000 to a seasonally adjusted 472,000, the Labor Department said Thursday. It was the highest level in a month and overshadowed a report that showed consumer prices remain essentially flat.

A rise in first-time jobless claims, combined with this week's report that said new home construction plunged in May after government incentives expired, highlighted fears about the strength of the economic rebound.

If layoffs persist, there's a concern that the June employment numbers may show a decline in private-sector jobs after five straight months of gains, said Jennifer Lee, an economist with BMO Capital Markets.

"We've definitely seen the economic recovery hit a wall," Lee said.

First-time jobless claims have hovered near 450,000 since the beginning of the year after falling steadily in the second half of 2009. That has raised concerns that hiring is lackluster and could slow the recovery.

The four-week average for unemployment claims, which smooths volatility, dipped slightly to 463,500. That's down by 3,750 from the start of January.

Kevin Logan, an economist with HSBC Securities, said many economists have been expecting claims to fall below 450,000 for several weeks now.

"The wait is getting longer and longer," said Logan. "As each week goes by, doubts about the underlying strength of the economic expansion grow."

A separate Labor report said consumer prices fell for the second straight month. The 0.2 decline in the Consumer Price Index was pulled down by falling energy prices — most notably a 5.2 percent drop in gasoline prices.

But core consumer prices, which strip out volatile energy and food, edged up 0.1 percent in May, after being flat in April. Core prices are up only 0.9 percent over the past year — below the Fed's inflation target.

Additionally, the Commerce Department said Thursday that the broadest measure of U.S. trade rose during the first quarter to the highest point in more than a year. Much of the widening deficit was due to higher prices on imported oil during the first three months of the year. Those prices have since come down.

And a private research group said its gauge of future economic activity rose 0.4 percent in May, signaling slow growth in the U.S. economy through the fall. Turmoil in stock markets and a troubled housing market weighed on the Conference Board's leading economic index, while measures related to interest rates and an increasing amount of money in the economy tugged it higher. The index is designed to forecast activity in the next three to six months.

Still, layoffs remain one of the biggest concerns for the recovery. Just this week, casino owner Wynn Resorts laid off more than 260 workers in its two Las Vegas casino hotels in a move expected to save nearly $8 million.

Economists have said they don't expect to see sustained job creation until first-time jobless claims drop below 425,000 per week.

But Julia Coronado, senior U.S. economist with BNP Paribas in New York, said she expects they will actually stabilize at around 450,000. That's because weaker segments of the economy are shedding jobs while stronger sectors are hiring.

The number of people continuing to claim benefits rose by 88,000 to 4.57 million. That doesn't include about 5.2 million people who receive extended benefits paid for by the federal government.

Congress has added 73 weeks of extra benefits on top of the 26 weeks typically provided by states. All told, about 9.7 million people received unemployment insurance in the week ending May 29, the most recent data available.

The extended benefit program expired this month. The House has approved an extension of the benefits through November. The Senate has yet to act.

On Wednesday, Senate Republicans and a dozen Democratic defectors rejected a catchall measure combining jobless aid for the long-term unemployed, aid to cash-strapped state governments and the renewal of dozens of popular tax breaks. Despite the loss, Democratic leaders predicted that a scaled-back version of the measure could pass, possibly later this week.

Adding to worries about the job market, the Labor Department said earlier this month that the economy generated only 41,000 private-sector jobs in May. That was down from 218,000 in April.

Temporary hiring by the Census Bureau added another 411,000 jobs. The unemployment rate fell to 9.7 percent from 9.9 percent.

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Cinderella Politics, It’s a Joke right? South Carolina Democrat, U.S. Senate Candidate Wins without Campaigning “no events, no signs, no debates, no website, no fundraising.”

Cinderella Politics, It’s a Joke right? South Carolina Democrat, U.S. Senate Candidate Wins without Campaigning “no events, no signs, no debates, no website, no fundraising.”
By Marc Chamot

“Greene, a 32-year-old unemployed military veteran who lives with his parents, defeated Vic Rawl on Tuesday for the Democratic Senatenomination despite having run essentially no public campaign — no events, no signs, no debates, no website, no fundraising.”


So why did he run, and how did he win? "I campaigned," Greene, who spoke rapidly and seemed distracted, told Yahoo! News in a brief interview. "It was a low-budget campaign. I funded it 100 percent out of my own pocket, and kept it simple — it was old-fashioned." Asked what, precisely, that campaign consisted of, and how much he spent on it, Greene demurred. "Not much. I had friends helping me."


He said he hasn't yet reached the $5,000 spending limit that triggers a requirement to file with the FEC, despite having spent that $10,400 filing fee (a pretty penny for someone with no job). Like any good politician, Greene tried to deflect questions about the particulars of his campaign to talk of "the issues."


"I graduated from the University of South Carolina," he said. "We have more unemployment than any other time in South Carolina history. Hold on, I have another beep."

Wow! Amazing! They are giving too much credit to Republicans for this one. Maybe anti-incumbencies movement has something to do with it too? Simply amazing, it’s just too laughable; it’s something movies are made out of…..It's either that or his OPPONENT was the biggest Idiot East of the rockies.

Mystery S.C. nominee has pending felony charge 
Alvin Greene has been on the phone all day. That's to be expected for the guy who just won South Carolina's Democratic Senate primary and is facing incumbent Republican Jim DeMint in November. But everyone calling Greene has just been trying to find out who the heck he is — and one thing reporters learned Tuesday is that a criminal complaint was sworn out against him last year for allegedly showing obscene photos to a South Carolina college student and suggesting they go to her dorm room.

The result has baffled political observers, who had heavily favored Rawl — a former state legislator, attorney and prosecutor who had the edge inasmuch as he actually campaigned and tried to win. Many in South Carolina (which has grandly lived up to its reputation as a political circus this year) suspect that somewhere, a crafty GOP politicaloperative is snickering.

As far as the local political press can discern, the only positive step Greene took toward campaigning was when he plunked down a $10,400 check in March to satisfy the state's filing fee and get on the ballot. He never registered a campaign committee with the FederalElection Commission or filed a financial disclosure with the Senate Ethics Committee.

Shortly after his Yahoo! News interview, the Associated Press reported that Greene was arrested in Novemberon the obscene photo complaint. Charges are pending, and he hasn't entered a plea. One could, of course, note that such charges wouldn't necessarily hurt a candidate in a Palmetto state election season that's featured plenty of sensational sexual charges.

Greene's candidacy has raised suspicions that he may have been induced to run by Republican operatives in order to sow dissension in the Democratic ranks. It's not uncommon in South Carolina for Republicans to recruit African-American challengers to run against white frontrunners in Democratic primaries in the hope of drumming up racial tensions. (Greene is black.) The straw candidates aren't supposed to win — they're just supposed to create a racially divisive primary to damage the candidate's ability to put together a coalition in the general election.

It's nothing new to Nu Wexler, the former executive director of the South Carolina Democratic Party. "In 2004, on the last day you could file to run in the primary, we were wrapping things up when an SUV with a Bush-Cheney sticker dropped off three black guys who came in to file to run in some local races, and they all paid the filing fee with sequentially numbered cashier's checks from a local credit union," he said. In 1990, famed South Carolina political consultant Rod Shealy was convicted of violating campaign laws after recruiting a black candidate to run in a GOP primary for lieutenant governor in the hope of drawing out racist voters — a maneuver he thought would bolster support for his candidate.

Greene denies that he's a plant. But even if he is, the lack of an actual campaign seems to indicate that whatever plan he might have been a part of was quickly abandoned. Wexler says there may never have even been much of a strategy: "You have consultants doing this kind of thing just because they get bored, and they want something to tell good stories about. It's almost like fraternity pranks."

Greene's success is a testament both to the lackluster quality of the campaign run by Rawl (who raised $186,000 and ran ads) and to the, um, peculiar voting habits of South Carolinians. State Democratic Party Chairwoman Carol Fowler speculated to AP that Greene won because his name came before Rawl's on the ballot. Wexler says Greene is a "big name in South Carolina."

We called the South Carolina Democratic Party to ask if it intends to support Greene's candidacy, but haven't heard back. It could attempt to challenge Greene's win by claiming that he didn't pay the filing fee out of his own pocket — which, if true, would be a federal crime. "It puts them in a tough position," Wexler said. "You can't exactly start challenging the filing fees of every candidate."

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Joran Vand der Sloot ARRESTED in Chile; Aruban/Dutch Natalee Holloway’s Killer Wanted in Peru for Murder of 21 Year-Old:

Joran Vand der Sloot ARRESTED in Chile; Aruban/Dutch Natalee Holloway’s Killer Wanted in Peru for Murder of 21 Year-Old:
By Marc Chamot

We shall NEVER forget you Natalee; I hope the scum gets his proper due in Peru this time. I hope they catch him in Chile, before the Aruban/Dutch cover up his tracks and protect him again, like they’ve did with Natalee. 


Suspect in Peru woman's slaying arrested in Chile, police say
Santiago, Chile (CNN) -- Joran van der Sloot, the suspect in a young woman's slaying this week in Peru and previously considered a suspect in the 2005 disappearance of Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway in Aruba, was captured Thursday in Chile, authorities said.

Van der Sloot is the main suspect in this week's slaying of 21-year-old Stephany Flores Ramirez, who was found Wednesday in a Lima, Peru, hotel room registered to the Dutch man. Chilean police told CNN that paperwork showed that van der Sloot entered Chile on Wednesday.

Peruvian Interior Minister Octavio Salazar Miranda said Thursday that Peru has made arrangements with Interpol to extradite van der Sloot.

Van der Sloot, 23, was traveling alone in a taxi near the Chilean central coastal city of Vina del Mar when he was detained, said Douglas Rodriguez, spokesman for the Chilean Investigative Police.

Van der Sloot was transported Thursday afternoon to police headquarters in Santiago, Chile's capital.

TV images showed him emerging from a black police SUV at the police station. His hair, which had been black in previous images, was red and worn in a close-cropped crew cut.

In Peru, a wake was held Thursday in Lima for Flores, who was scheduled to be buried later in the day.

There is "incriminating evidence" linking van der Sloot to the killing of Flores, said Peruvian criminal investigator Cesar Guardia Vasquez.

The woman's bludgeoned body was found in Room 309 of the Hotel Tac in the Miraflores section of Lima, police said. She suffered blunt trauma to the head, breaking her neck, and to her torso and back, Peruvian police said Thursday.

Joran van der Sloot is wanted for murder of a 21 year old girl named Stephany Tatiana Flores in Peru, according to MSNBC.


Joran van der Sloot flees Chile
 Joran fled Peru enroute to Chile on Monday, May 31, according to immigration officials, who also said he entered Peru from Columbia on May 14.
Stephany was stabbed to death, her body left in a hotel room registered to Joran van der Sloot, the suspect in the Natalie Holloway disappearance in Aruba in 2005. The Alabama teen, Natalie Holloway, was never found and Joran van der Sloot has been the primary suspect to date in her disappearance and possible murder.

van der Sloot courts Stephany like he did Natalie
Joran seems to have used the same pick up technique on Stephany Flores as he did with Natalie Holloway, according to authorities. The 22-year-old Joran was seen on Saturday night, May 28, in a videotape of the Chile Atlantic Casino with the woman he is suspected of murdering.
A witness and a hotel employee told officials they saw Joran and Stephany together on Sunday as well, the day she is believed to have died.

Alleged murderer flees the next day for Chile
Joran fled Peru on Monday, the day after Stephany was supposedly killed. Interpol has been alerted about the Dutch man's wanted condition and law enforcement in Peru are actively pursuing all leads to his whereabouts.
The victim, Stephany Flores, was the daughter of a local businessman and race car driver named Ricardo Flores.

 


FAIR USE POLICY:

Fair Use: This site may contain copyrighted materials, with use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.

I am making these materials available in my efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc.

I am also using such materials to rebut and dispute arguments, when they ARE not based on FACTS.

I'm here to offer my own argument, opinions and judgments on the subject matters, which MAY interfere with my constitutional rights, towards receiving, fair political representations from my federal, state and local representatives.

I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes.

When I post photos, I may have inadvertently posted one without prior knowledge of actual ownerships.

If you feel I may have violated some of YOUR copyright of some sorts, you HAVE the right to email or post a comment, requesting my removal of such material(s), such as photos and full postings of articles, however I reserve the right to keep the main idea, snippets of your article on my blog, protected under the FAIR USE ACT.

"There are two major developments, she says, that are new this year and insufficiently noted, but they're going to shape election outcomes in 2010 and beyond. First, Washington is being revealed in a new way.

The American people now know, "with real sophistication," everything that happens in the capital. "I find a much more knowledgeable electorate, and it is a real-time response," Ms. Blackburn says. "We hear about it even as the vote is taking place."

Voters come to rallies carrying research—"things they pulled off the Internet, forwarded emails," copies of bills, roll-call votes. The Internet isn't just a tool for organization and fund-raising. It has given citizens access to information they never had before. "The more they know," Ms. Blackburn observes, "the less they like Washington."-Tennessee Representative Marsha Blackburn


Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population; by creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization; satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation; augmenting primitive feelings of envy; rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56494

Are WE that Dumb? Our Educational System is a Total Failure & no wonder we keep on electing Losers!

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Disclaimer

“Where I have NO SHAME to tell it like it is! It’s GUARANTEED that you might not like SOME of what I write, and you’re bound to get ticked off, one way or another.”