Is Republican Scott Brown’s Massachusetts Victory in a Deep Blue State, the Re-Birth of new breeds “Red Dog Republicans?”

Is Republican Scott Brown’s Massachusetts Victory in a Deep Blue State, the Re-Birth of new breeds “Red Dog Republicans?”
By Marc Chamot

Interesting reversal of fortunes for the two main parties in charge of all American politics, while one is on the upswing, the other one is on a fast decline.

With Senator Scott Brown’s Massachusetts victory in the bluest of all states, can we then call it the re-birth of the new breeds of “Red Dog Republicans?”

We all heard about these so called “Blue Dog Democrats,” they are the more moderate Democrats and Washington politicians, who most were elected in predominately Republican conservative areas of the country for the past five years.

"Blue Dogs" were supposed to be the more moderates of all Democrats, and fiscally prudent, and more leaning conservatives of the Democratic Party, but unfortunately, somewhere along the line, they went wayward, they failed miserably to keep and hold their promise of what they were supposed to be and represent within their districts.

I find it curious as to why the Democratic arm of the more fiscally conservative arm of the Democratic Party, the “Blue Dogs,” totally failed their constituencies, by supporting those very unpopular Obama and Pelosi’s costly deficit busting schemes, like the billion dollar bailouts and the billion dollar healthcare fiascos.

It was dumb; it was the dumbest thing for them to do, just when they were so successful in wrestling districts away from Republicans.

This is why I think, the right-wing of the Republican Party are not going to get every thing they want from Scott Brown, and any other future “Red Dog Republicans” who will be coming around, mainly from those Democrat controlled Blue States like Massachusetts and possibly California.

Where the Blue Dogs failed, instead of holding true to their convictions that got them elected in the first place, with the voters of their districts, they succumbed to Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid’s left-wing agendas.

Maybe these new breeds of “Red Dog Republicans” can do much better where these Blue Dogs have failed.

It’s interesting also; the Independents were the forces that created these new breeds of politicians in both parties, but if I were a big betting man, Scott Brown and the others, who will surely follow his path, they will be more apt to listen to the Independent voter’s concerns, rather than the small fringes of the Right-Wing of the Republican Party.

These new breeds of Republicans could even survive in a blue state for years to come. It’s something for the GOP hierarchy to really think about, I think.

Understanding Independents, Why we VOTE the way we do & a Great Jay Ambrose Piece “Time to Hide, Liberals”

Understanding Independents, Why we VOTE the way we do & a Great Jay Ambrose Piece “Time to Hide, Liberals”
By Marc Chamot

The old saying that after a little time, American voters forget about incidents and issues related to both party’s politicians and they keep on voting for the same candidates, time after time. Well, that was true, until Independents came along.

There is no doubt that the liberal left, just had their Sarah Palin moment, and they are in a state of disarray, shock and panic, when Republican Scott Brown won Ted Kennedy’s senate seat of Massachusetts.

The political worlds have just discovered what Independents are all about. When President Obama won the U.S. presidency, he and his supporters thought that he won it through his liberal base, and that he and his congressional liberal leftists had been given a mandate to trample all over this country with their agendas.

The wannabes political pundits and some columnists said oh, Obama won because of the Hispanic votes, he won the election with the women’s votes, the gay votes and so forth. It was also common knowledge that President Obama got the largest share of the Independent votes.

The effects of Independents in elections were never truly known, until recently. The last three anti-Obama elections that landed Republicans in office were done, by large with the help of Independent voters.

As I have said on my blogs, three years ago. Lookout for the Independents, they will sway all future American elections. You’ve really got to give credit to Lou Dobbs, if it weren’t for Lou Dobbs, the causes and interests for the Independent Party would have never grown as big as it is today.

I have no problems with the Democratic Party as a whole; my problem is with their inept leadership all over around, from California to D.C. This party has been hijacked by the far-left, and the Republican Party has been hijacked by the far-right.

Who are Independent voters? WE DEPLORE PARTISANSHIPS; we are the angry, dissatisfied, and disenfranchised former Democratic and Republican registered voters. Many don’t contribute moneys to political campaigns, they don’t have any party allegiances’, and they JUST VOTE for the person that meets their interest.

Some Independents are hard to reach, unlike registered Democrats or Republicans; some Independents don’t go to political rallies and fundraisings. Independents are politically smarter, and usually free of party biases, they are more issue oriented.

When I started the Marc Chamot Report and Opinions, it became more of the accurate way for the average angry populists think and believe, whether some of my readers like it or not, and without any party prejudices.

Many Independents either lean Democrat or Republican, but I lean Republican because of my religious and conservative beliefs. The most common thing about many of the Independents, we all want to see the nation going in the right direction. We don’t really care who governs, unless they are doing their jobs well.

Many of us have believe in the same issues as Democrats and Republicans, I’m Independent because I only agree with 45 percent of the Democrats’ views, whereas 55 with the Republicans on political issues. So, I cannot be a happy party member, but I’d rather sit on the sidelines and be the party’s spoilers.

But the truth is; if President Obama does eventually listen and change from his left leaning policies, if he does decide to take this country forward, and if they agree with mine, I will definitely support him.

I enjoy reading Jay Ambrose, he kind of took the words right out of my mouth, about what I feel has been going on with the far-left, and he’s got a pretty good take about the recent demises of liberal left Democrat’s elections. It’s a pretty awesome article, and it’s a must read for all:

Time to hide, liberals
Go back some decades, and it looked as if liberals were going to be the death of America. They wanted to take it really easy on criminals. They favored welfare programs that destroyed families. They backed foreign aid that buttressed tyrannies. Their way of dealing with enemies was unilateral disarmament. Still other proposals could have spent, taxed and regulated us into oblivion.

The voters didn't like all of this, the L-word became a curse, and so liberals went into something akin to a witness protection program. They changed their name to "progressives" and if they did not quite hide out, they became less obtrusive with some of their views. Yes, they griped, fumed, engaged in numerous sneak attacks and thumbed their noses at the opposition, but they did turn the lights dimmer than before on their grand vision of free-enterprise destruction and runaway statism.

Ah, but then after their surprising 1990s ascension came the self-destruction of earmark-happy, spendthrift congressional Republicans who seemed to assume power was theirs forever, even if many of their principles were proving strangely evaporative.

So first off, the Democrats took back Congress. Then Barack Obama used unexcelled rhetorical skills, a recession, an unpopular war in Iraq and George W. Bush's deep decline in public estimation to capture the White House. Conservative values had supposedly been rejected, and behold, it was the liberal hour, a time for the enlightened few to strike back, to fix things - glory, glory hallelujah!

The arrogance was suffocating. Resurrected liberals were practically smirking as they instructed us to sweet-talk our way out of terrorist threats, advised we should quickly duplicate Europe's semi-socialist mistakes and condescendingly dished up all manner of other liberty-smothering ideological inanities that would transform America into a poor imitation of what it once was if anyone actually acted on them.

Washington Democrats said they would do their best.

Let's all get Keynesian, the liberals said, and pretty soon Obama and friends were giving us a stimulus package costing as much as the war Obama opposed. But then, oh, dear, it turned out not to work, job losses actually accelerated and meanwhile, along with other spending enthusiasms, it was threatening to eviscerate our future with mounting debt.

Our liberal-inspired Democrats weren't through. Obama and his congressional buddies had a trillion-dollar, ineffectual, welfare-worsening health care plan they aimed to pass through secrecy and dishonest deals, and then they wanted to eat away at our industrial base with a global warming program achieving nothing. There were hopes of making illegal aliens legal ... but wait, what was that rustling in the bushes?

Why, it was dissent. It was tea party rallies. It was independents telling pollsters they were losing faith in Obama and the Democrats. It was commentators refusing to scatter to the woods when the outraged, don't-dare-criticize-us liberals rose up and roared, claiming media bias even though the bias was mostly on their side.

They just couldn't stand it, these liberals, and they kept harrumphing about vicious ignorance when they were the ones whose moral superiority had been exposed as fraudulent and whose intellectual flabbiness had been put on display for the world to see.

Ordinary Americans have caught onto all of this, and so, I am sorry, liberals, but the word of the day for you is "lose." Your side has lost elections in New Jersey and Virginia, and now your side has lost the Senate seat previously held by the very liberal Ted Kennedy in very liberal Massachusetts to Scott Brown, a Republican.

The message to the Democrats is simple. Either give up your liberal ways and veer toward the center or face political catastrophe in November's general election. The message to liberals generally is also simple: Get back into your witness protection program.

Schwarzenegger Admits: Illegal Immigrants Costing Californian Taxpayers $6.9 Billion for Education, Medical Services & Incarcerations:

The Truths Being Told; Schwarzenegger Admits: Illegal Immigrants Costing Californian Taxpayers $6.9 Billion for Education, Medical Services & Incarcerations:
By Marc Chamot

The problem with political PANDERINGS to certain ethnic groups, the truths get distorted and covered up, until the time FOR reckoning is upon YOU.

I had written last year during the California budget woes, by my estimates the state of California were spending over $5 billion dollars in taxpayer’s money for services rendered to illegal immigrants. Amazingly as it seems, I was off $1.9 billion dollars!

I had criticized Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger for covering up the real costs as to what the state were really spending in social services and incarcerations for illegal immigrants.

It wasn’t until Governor Schwarzenegger’s recent California state of union address that he actually told the truths, about the costly expenses that the incarcerating, providing free education, and other social services, and including FREE medical to California illegal’s, and it is bursting the state financially.

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger says; $6.9 billion dollars of state money goes to support illegal immigrants in his state, and wants the Federal government, Ohio, Texans, Arkansas, Oklahomans and so forth, all to pay for it.

But obviously, the governor isn’t running again for office. So he doesn’t need to pander for the Hispanic votes again, and now he comes out and tells the real truths about the true costs of illegal immigration.

But of course, the liberal California media are blasting him for it, as well as my favorite odd-ball buddy, a pro illegal alien supporter, Ruben Navarette with this article piece.

"This isn't the Arnold we knew.

In 2006, during a meeting with the editorial board of a Spanish-language newspaper, La Opinion Schwarzenegger said it was a mistake for him to have supported Proposition 187, a mean-spirited ballot initiative in 1994 that denied education, social services and nonemergency health care to illegal immigrants.

In 2007, in a speech to the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, Schwarzenegger called President George W. Bush "very courageous" for pursuing comprehensive immigration reform that included a pathway to earned legalization for the 12 million undocumented immigrants in the United States.

In 2008, during a meeting with the editorial board of the San Diego Union-Tribune, Schwarzenegger insisted that the United States has long struggled with the immigration issue in part because "there is always a certain percentage of people who just don't like foreigners."

And in 2009, during another meeting with the Union-Tribune, Schwarzenegger disputed the claim that California was in distress because it provides services to illegal immigrants. In fact, he said, theundocumented contribute to the California economy by working in hard-to-staff industries.

Schwarzenegger could have mentioned some of that in his State of the State address. Instead, he started arguing that California has been shortchanged. He claimed that the state only gets 78 cents back from the federal government for every dollar it sends to Washington while other states get a better return.

One reason the economic picture is grim, he said, is that "Californians carry a special burden since we are a border state."Schwarzenegger said that the federal government though responsible for controlling the border is "not even funding a 50-50 split of the costs of undocumented immigrants."

Claiming that his state is owed billions of dollars for providing social programs, education and health care and other services to illegal immigrants, he vowed to fight for reimbursement.As part of his proposed budget for the 2010-11 fiscal years, Schwarzenegger is asking for $6.9 billion in federal funds to help close a $20 billion deficit.

In doing all this, Schwarzenegger perpetuates the fiction that illegal immigration is something that was done to California when, in reality, it is something that the state did to itself.

It's true that California has more illegal immigrants than any other state. But that's because it has more than its share of employers who hire illegal immigrants."

My point precisely, what Ruben Navarette should be complaining about, is the way American politicians PANDER for Latino votes.

We all know that game, don’t we? We saw it with Hillary Clinton, Obama, and McCain during the presidential races, and with the whole slew of pandering politicians, west of the Pecos, who want their votes, no matter what the costs are to this nation and taxpayers.

Haiti, after the 2004 Indian Ocean Earthquake & Katrina; World is too Ill Prepared to Handle World Disasters:

Haiti, after the 2004 Indian Ocean Earthquake & Katrina; World is too Ill Prepared to Handle World Disasters:
By Marc Chamot

In this posting, call me a "sanctimonious fool," or maybe the left side of me may be sneaking out, but what ever happened in Haiti, it’s a real tragedy all around.

The poorest nation in our hemisphere got the worst hell imaginable this past week.

Once in a while world tragedies like the Haiti earthquake wakes humans up and makes us human beings again, until it fades away with time, and then we become the human scourges’ of the earth, until the next WORLD disaster befalls us.

This is about the third time, fourth, or fifth times we’ve witnessed cataclysmic world disasters. The end results of it all; it has united and moved our country and the world for positive and for negative common causes. But most of the time world aid has been slow coming for most. In the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and others, most people died days and weeks after the disasters occurred.

First there was this; “The 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake was an undersea megathrust earthquake that occurred at 00:58:53 UTC on December 26, 2004, with an epicentre off the west coast of Sumatra, Indonesia. The quake itself is known by the scientific community as the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake.[3][4] The resulting tsunami itself is given various names, including the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, Asian Tsunami, Indonesian Tsunami, and Boxing Day Tsunami.

The earthquake was caused by subduction and triggered a series of devastating tsunamis along the coasts of most landmasses bordering the Indian Ocean, killing nearly 230,000 people in fourteen countries, and inundating coastal communities with waves up to 30 meters (100 feet) high. It was one of the deadliest natural disasters in recorded history. Indonesia, Sri Lanka, India, and Thailand were the hardest hit.

With a magnitude of between 9.1 and 9.3, it is the second largest earthquake ever recorded on a seismograph. This earthquake had the longest duration of faulting ever observed, between 8.3 and 10 minutes. It caused the entire planet to vibrate as much as 1 cm (0.4 inches)[5] and triggered other earthquakes as far away as Alaska.[6]

The plight of the many affected people and countries prompted a widespread humanitarian response. In all, the worldwide community donated more than $7 billion (2004 U.S. dollars) in humanitarian aid.”

And then there was this; “Hurricane Katrina of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season was the costliest hurricane,[3][4] as well as one of the five deadliest, in the history of the United States.[5] Among recorded Atlantic hurricanes, it was the sixth strongest overall.

Hurricane Katrina formed over the Bahamas on August 23, 2005 and crossed southern Florida as a moderate Category 1 hurricane, causing some deaths and flooding there before strengthening rapidly in the Gulf of Mexico.

The storm weakened before making its second landfall as a Category 3 storm on the morning of Monday, August 29 in southeast Louisiana. It caused severe destruction along the Gulf coast from central Florida to Texas, much of it due to the storm surge.

The most severe loss of life and property damage occurred in New Orleans, Louisiana, which flooded as the levee system catastrophically failed, in many cases hours after the storm had moved inland.[6] Eventually 80% of the city and large tracks of neighboring parishes became flooded, and the floodwaters lingered for weeks.[6]

At least 1,836 people lost their lives in the actual hurricane and in the subsequent floods, making it the deadliest U.S. hurricane since the 1928 Okeechobee hurricane. Economist and crisis consultant Randall Bell wrote: "Hurricane Katrina in 2005 was the largest natural disaster in the history of the United States.”

Was all of this God’s way to get us to act like the real human beings that we should be?
You can’t blame the suffering people in Haiti for what evil governments do.

And now with the Haiti tragedy, it is showing a number of things again, one thing for sure; it is showing how the world has placed the poor of the poorest, like in Haiti into faceless throw away societies. Homes built which cannot withstand moderate earthquakes. Help coming days after the earthquake striking.

It’s not all Americas’ fault; it’s the entire world’s faults. If the world weren’t so geared up and prepared for WARS, instead we could be better prepared and have better responses times for world disasters like the one in Haiti.

If the world hadn’t marginalized Haiti, they would be better off economically.

Because of wars, we weren’t prepared for Katrina, and because of wars it took the world days to react to Haiti’s tragedy. I hope that the world sees this, the future of the world is not for warring, it will be for helping those less fortunate than us like Haiti.

Because of people and corporate greed, we only do business with countries that make us money, countries like Haiti, and its peoples are just left alone to DIE in sheer poverty.

No, I don’t blame America at all. I am very proud that America took the lead once again in a world disaster. But, I blame the Muslim terrorists who want to prolong wars with terrorism that led us to ineffectively handle Hurricane Katrina.

I also blame China, who never contributes anything towards world disasters; their whole system is set up militarily and for wars, possibly against the West. I blame Russia, just like China, they are geared up militarily for wars. These two don’t have the capability to assist in any world disasters like Haiti.

I also blame many wealthy nations who don’t give a damn for poor people like Haitians, and they don’t contribute much either for other poor nations like Africa.

All of these disasters show three things, America will always be there for YOU, the good and bad in people around the world like China and Russia, and that YOU can always depend on America and its peoples.

UCLA’s BOGUS Study; Claims Legalizing Illegal’s will add $1.5 Trillion into Our Economy & Get the U.S. Out of the Economic Crisis:

UCLA’s BOGUS Study; Claims Legalizing Illegal’s will add $1.5 Trillion into Our Economy & Get the U.S. Out of the Economic Crisis:
By Marc Chamot

Another bogus UCLA pro-immigration study just came out. It stated, that if we legalize the 12-15 million or so illegal immigrants, it would add an additional $1.5 trillion dollars for the next decade into our economy.

The problem with this, yes, you guessed it! This study was done by a far left wing organization that promotes open borders and legalizing illegal immigrants within the UCLA university compounds.

For starters, this study isn’t bi-partisan and secondly, the study picks a number out of thin air, without substantiating any other facts.

How will legalizing 12 to 15 million illegal aliens going to help the 15 plus millions of unemployed Americans?

Secondly, what pro-open borders Professor Raul Hinojosa-Ojeda doesn’t tell you, are one congressional report, the Jordan Commission Report that came out in 1995, stating the opposite.

It stated that bringing in low waged and uneducated immigrants, kills the American economy. And that they have no value for America, except for using our already strained socialized welfares systems when they want to, and on top of it all, Illegal immigration kills REAL American jobs and wages.

There is another aspect of the study by the Center for American Progress and Immigration Policy Center at UCLA that they don’t tell you.

When millions of these illegal immigrants become legal, they will get fired from their jobs, because these employers will go out and seek for lower waged earners, i.e. more illegal aliens to take their places, just like they once were.

In other words, these illegal aliens will become replaced and will become burdensome to our bursting social services, like unemployment, medical healthcare, federal and states Medicare programs and so forth. It will become a viscous never ending circle, of the United States being slowly replaced by illegal aliens LOOKING for costly BENEFITS.

It’s a hard FACT, they like to take out more than what they put in.

And most of these people send their moneys abroad to help maintain their families and build new homes, they don’t spend or invest much into their local American economies, and that’s a hard fact to state.

The biggest and most violent crimes in the nation are now being done by Latino gangs, offsprings born from illegal aliens. I just don't see the benefits at all.

If Professor Raul Hinojosa-Ojeda thinks that legalizing illegal immigrants will put 1.5 trillion into our economy, real common sense tells me that it will cost us at least that much and more added into our DEFICIT, to give them benefits, especially during a sour economy AND it will not help our 15 to 16 millions unemployed to get their JOBS back.

So sorry, this study is now debunked and unqualified to be taken seriously folks.

Study predicts $1.5 trillion increase in GDP if undocumented immigrants are legalized.
A new study by University of California at Los Angeles professor Raúl Hinojosa-Ojeda suggests that comprehensive immigration reform, which includes an earned path to legalization for undocumented immigrants, could generate at least $1.5 trillion in added U.S. gross domestic product over 10 years. Hinojosa explains the data behind his immense calculation:

All immigrant workers in this scenario have full labor rights, which results in higher wages — and higher worker productivity—for all workers in industries where large numbers of immigrants are employed. As wage and productivity levels rise, the U.S. economy’s demand for new immigrant workers actually declines over time as the market shrinks for easily exploited, low-wage, low-productivity workers.

The higher earning power of newly legalized workers translates into an increase in net personal income of $30 to $36 billion, which would generate $4.5 to $5.4 billion in additional net tax revenue. Moreover, an increase in personal income of this scale would generate consumer spending sufficient to support 750,000 to 900,000 jobs…

According to Hinojosa, a mass deportation program often cited by right-wing enforcement-only advocates would actually result in a loss of $2.6 trillion over ten years while a solution that only consists of a temporary worker program that labor unions vehemently oppose and some moderate Republicans support would only yield $792 billion increase in GDP and also lead to a decrease in wages.

Legislating from the Bench; Threats to U.S. Judges and Prosecutors Increasing at Alarming Rate:

Legislating from the Bench; Threats to U.S. Judges and Prosecutors Increasing at Alarming Rate:
By Marc Chamot

"This is the fallout when federal governments want to exert their anti-constitutional opinions and powers over the people, with their Federal Judges and prosecutors."

Threats to U.S. judges and prosecutors have more than doubled in the past six years according to new government reports issued Monday. The report by Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine concluded there are still major gaps in reporting and responding to threats.

Concerns about security for judges intensified five years ago over a killing of a federal judge in Chicago over a supposed negligent ruling. From 2003 to 2008 there have been a number of threats and inappropriate communications to judges and prosecutors; it has jumped from 592 to 1,278 the report found.

Judges, and mainly federal ones, have lost touch with the common people, and have become more legislators from the bench, the supporters for the few, rather than the majority, instead of following the U.S. constitution and rules of law; they have been making contrary decisions.

Many of these judges are wantonly ruining and disregarding people’s constitutional rights, and lives, over their political philosophies from the bench.

This is another aspect that is going to spark some kind of anti-government revolts around this country.

You can see it in California when an idiotic federal judge allowed environmentalists to shut off water supplies, because of fish, to the Fresno valley agricultural lands. It is currently destroying California farms and jobs.

Another example is a San Francisco Federal Judge, Vaughn R. Walker, who wanted to support the pro-gay marriages groups, in an attempt to reverse the California’s Supreme Court’s validation of No Gay Marriages in California.

A law VOTED by the people and confirmed by the California Supreme Court last year, Judge Vaughn Walker ordered the anti-gay marriages groups to illegally divulge all of their memos, e-mails, and inner campaign communications, to find some kind of discriminations and hate during the campaigns for proposition 8.

Vaughn Walker, wanted to lazily find good cause to strike down the law voted by the people, by unconstitutionally dig into the privacy and secrets of political campaigning’s of the No to California Gay Marriages, but fortunately, this idiotic ORDER was struck down by the U.S. Ninth Superior Courts of Appeals.

This is what this country has become; it’s is a country being legislated from the bench, not only by corrupt politicians, but also by corrupt anti-constitutionalists judges, such as Vaughn Walker. The VOTES of American voters don’t count anymore.