Hollywood Gunman’s Former Girlfriend a Model? No! Is Alicia Alligood a Model Mayhem? Yep-piddy-Yep, I Guess she’s is one:

Hollywood Gunman’s Former Girlfriend a Model? No! Is Alicia Alligood a Model Mayhem? Yep-piddy-Yep, I Guess she’s is one:

By Marc Chamot


Photos of Alicia Alligood were forcibly removed because;

"Hello, While I never heard back from you, perhaps you have already seen my response to your blog post discussing Tyler Brehm and I.

I requested you remove it and am still waiting for you to do so. It's quite simple and I'm sure it wouldn't take long. It's a good thing you have such a broad and consistent database of posts on various topics; dropping the one entitled, "Hollywood Gunman’s Former Girlfriend a Model? No! Is Alicia Alligood a Model Mayhem? Yep-piddy-Yep, I Guess she’s is one," certainly won't affect your ratings....

It's very, very important you remove the post as well as the comments. I am all about the idea of an open forum and, as a writer, I have a deep appreciation for the exchange of ideas, but this has gotten out of hand. Someone who obviously has a vendetta with Tyler recently left horrible comments that are illustrating him via lies & exaggerations.

I completely understand your post's discussion as an attempt to cover part of the story, but this other individual (I'm confident I know who it is) has chosen to create an outrage against Tyler because of their intense and unhealthy hatred toward he and I.

I hope you'll agree that it's time the article & comments be permanently removed. Our families are dealing with WAY TOO MUCH (there have been 2 more deaths since Tyler's) and would appreciate your help on this one.
Thank You,
Alicia Alligood

Marc, Exactly, it's just your info from the net, and yes--you are wrong, Mr. Chamot. Anyway you posted MY photographs without MY permission. You are also erroneous in stating that people involved with this case want "all the publicity they can get." More importantly than all of that is this other individual's bold & false claims about Tyler. It's not that difficult for you to just remove it. It's doing more harm than good.
Alicia

You are mistaken; I do not care what you have to say, yet I feel it is worth my time kindly asking you to remove the slanderous blog & comments from your site. I understand that this situation with Tyler and I is, sickeningly, a potential money-making opportunity for you, but I will absolutely NOT PAY you to for rights to the material. I don't desire it in any form. You got the story from us... not the other way around.

Throughout some of this aftermath of December 09th, I have consulted with my attorney on a few matters. We discussed the issues surrounding your "article" and I was surprised to learn you are actually violating more laws, and even some civil offenses, than I had previously realized.

Thanks for your "advice," yet we already have legal counsel so it really isn't a big deal for us to impose a lawsuit becomes necessary."
Alicia Alligood

Okay Alicia: After re-analyzing my article/story; in regards to my comments on Tyler Brehm, my story stays. 


And take that to YOUR lawyer, and even spend all your money on lawyers fees if you want, I couldn't care less. You'll lose, I then will counter sue you for harassment.

Tyler Brehm was a media and national story, he lost his rights as a private citizen, when he walked down a street in Hollywood, firing his gun at people, until the cops shot him dead. He lost his private citizen's libel protections when he committed the crime.

In regards to you, you were mentioned by the news Medias and hundreds of blogs and I reported about you, exactly what was mentioned by the Media, however, I brought up the case of you being or want to be a model, through ModelMayhem, which is true, and those are the facts that will never change. So sue me.

But! In regards to your photos, I am not admitting any wrong doings, even though your photos were on the Internet where anybody could access them, they were available in a public domain called ModelMayhem, however, I did not want to be hassled or threatened over this by you anymore, I have removed ALL of your photos from this posting, and instead, will be replaced with photos of Tyler Brehm, which are of public domains.

This is a political blog; I don’t usually write about nutcases who go on rampage. What I found pretty sneaky curious, in the world of Internet. 

Every time one hears about some atrocious crime being committed by some perpetrator, their Facebook page is usually the first to go, get deleted or disappear, into the never land of Cyberspace.

But somehow, this Hollywood shooter, that lovesick and despondent guy; well holly-and-behold! His freaking Facebook page was still around! No kidding! It’s Hollywood alright; they enjoy all the publicity they can get. But what’s most fascinating of all, it’s what one can dig up these days on the Net.

And sometimes things aren’t pretty. Everybody is speculating about what actually triggered the Hollywood gunman, Tyler Brehm, to walk down the street and shoot at people.

Actually, have you all seen that video of his half-hazardless way of shooting at people? Yeah. Go take another look, because Tyler Brehm didn’t look too serious about wanting to kill anybody. It seemed like he was screaming for attention, and regardless his motives, he got it and he’s dead now.

As vehicles were passing by, he slowly moved the pistol up and down without aiming at anything and took pop-shots towards vehicles driving by. Any experienced gunman, who’s really serious about hurting people, he could have certainly done a lot more damage.

According to Tyler Brehm’s Facebook page, there was one thing that struck me as odd.

There was one entry in there that struck me as strange. After the part on December 6^th, when Tyler Brehm says, went from being “in a relationship” to “single.”

There was an odd entry that kind of surprised me. It came from one of his friends and commenter Elena Matveeva, on December 6th at 10:27 pm, with a simple wtf???

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that Elena Matveeva was pretty ticked off by the comment. And since then, there were no more entries in Facebook.

"Friends were removed, to protect Facebook member's privacy"

I’m not going to speculate here, he may have ruined two relationships, not one. His former girlfriend Alicia Alligood, mentioned about another woman when she broke up with Tyler.

I am not going to go any further on this issue, I’ll let gossip magazines do it, because that’s what they are good for, and they’ve got a whole lot more money than I do to withstand a lawsuit. But that “wtf???” bothers me a lot, and keeps gnawing at me.

To my biggest surprise; Tyler’s former girlfriend, the one he recently broke up with, Alicia Alligood is a an aspiring model! 

Actually, and really, she’s got a page on Model Mayhem. Oh yeah! And she’s isn’t bad looking either.

I do not know how thriving is her modeling career, but I guess it might just get a little better after all the publicity of this nightmare.

Obviously, there was a whole lot of jealousy, and anger, in Tyler Brehm behind the break-up. When I was younger, in my good-looking days, I know how much it hurts, with heart-breakers like Alicia Alligood.

Judge Rules in Defamation of Character Lawsuit; Bloggers are not Journalists & Have no Shield Law Protections:

Judge Rules in Defamation of Character Lawsuit; Bloggers are not Journalists & Have no Shield Law Protections:

By Marc Chamot

Bloggers around are very concerned about recent events on a federal judge’s ruling, calling bloggers are not protected people, under general Media journalistic shield laws. 

Bloggers are too concerned by this ruling, but they shouldn’t be. It’s because, under those same conditions, and even protected journalists under shield laws, would have been sued for defamation of character just the same.

This attorney was not a public figure, and the blogger in question who was sued, should have known better, than calling someone an unsubstantiated ‘thug’ and ‘thief’ over the Internet.  

The lawyer in question sued his former client for defamation of character, who happened to be an established blogger. Had the judge ruled journalistic protections for the blogger, this blogger was still liable for defamation of character regardless.

Even though Crystal was very angry at her former attorney, and according to her opinion, her angry rants were based on shoddy legal work she had received. Regardless, unless she was writing about John Gotti, or any other incarcerated felons, or even Blago, and she had no business calling anyone on the Internet, a ‘thug’ and a ‘thief.’

Crystal L. Cox had every right to vent her beefs towards the lawyer on the Internet, and however, she could have stated her version of the story by having proof available to back up her story, if the contract was broken, by using different methods. It would have been safer to use the indirect approach in writing, rather than the direct one. It could have been equally as effective.

She could have said, ‘I feel ripped off’ instead of calling the man a ‘thief.’ He didn’t accomplish or do what he promised, and she could have also said this lawyer was very aggressive, rude, and so forth, instead of calling him a ‘thug.’ It’s all about choices of words and making the right choice, before getting sued over what you say on the Internet.

Unproven direct accusations, can lead anyone towards serious and costly civil suits, and the saddest part of this, Crystal will suffer financially for the rest of her life because of those two words, she maliciously used. All could have been avoided, had she exercised good self control. And she should have given herself a day or two to cool down, before exposing someone, even a lawyer on the Internet.

Much to do about nothing; “a federal judge in Oregon has ruled that a Montana woman sued for defamation was not a journalist when she posted online that an Oregon lawyer acted criminally during a bankruptcy case, a decision with implications for bloggers around the country.

Crystal L. Cox, a blogger from Eureka, Mont., was sued for defamation by attorney Kevin Padrick when she posted online that he was a thug and a thief during the handling of bankruptcy proceedings by him and Obsidian Finance Group LLC.

U.S. District Judge Marco Hernandez found last week that as a blogger, Cox was not a journalist and cannot claim the protections afforded to mainstream reporters and news outlets.

The judge ruled that Cox was not protected by Oregon's shield law from having to produce sources, saying even though Cox defines herself as media, she was not affiliated with any mainstream outlet.

The lawyer sued Cox for defamation, a legal fight that is typically difficult for plaintiffs to win. Public figures, for example, must prove the defendant knew the statement in question was false, and the statement must be matters of public interest.

The judge found that Padrick was not a public figure, and that the bankruptcy case was not in the public interest. The ruling opened the way for a jury to award $2.5 million to Padrick and Obsidian.

The judge ruled that Cox was not protected by Oregon's shield law from having to produce sources, saying even though Cox defines herself as media, she was not affiliated with any mainstream outlet.

He added that the shield law does not apply to civil actions for defamation.”

It all came down to choice of words used.

More on Federal judge: Montana blogger is not journalist

"Hernandez said Cox was not a journalist because she offered no professional qualifications as a journalist or legitimate news outlet. She had no journalism education, credentials or affiliation with a recognized news outlet, proof of adhering to journalistic standards such as editing or checking her facts, evidence she produced an independent product or evidence she ever tried to get both sides of the story.  Cox said she didn't have the money to pay the judgment, and that she intended to keep posting about the Summit bankruptcy case. "My intensions are the highest and best," she said. "I know I am sometimes over the top or a little bit vulgar. But I encourage people not to listen to me or him but to look at the documents and make their own decision based on that." Padrick said the case showed how vulnerable anyone was to someone with a computer. He said he has lost business from potential clients who search his name and firm through Google and find Cox's postings at the top of the list, adding that he has no way to remove them. "If anyone can self-proclaim themselves to be media, the concept of media is rendered worthless," Padrick said. "When everyone is media, the concept of media is gone." The judge ruled that Padrick and his company did not have to seek a retraction, as required by Oregon law, before claiming damages, because a blogger is not on the list of recognized media, which include newspapers, magazines, television and radio news, and motion pictures. Padrick said he did not expect to collect much of the $2.5 million jury award, or to see his business fully rebound. He said his only consolation was that all eight jurors who heard the case believed he had been significantly harmed."

Alexa.com Algorithm SEO’s, Once Again Proven to be highly Inaccurate & Extremely Unreliable, Instead Why NOT GO With Klout, yes, klout.com!

Alexa.com Algorithm SEO’s, Once Again Proven to be highly Inaccurate & Extremely Unreliable, Instead Why NOT GO With Klout, yes, klout.com!

By Marc Chamot

If you rely on Alexa.com to measure your blog’s SEO’s, or anyone else’s, watch out, it’s proven to be inaccurate. Their algorithm system is way out of whack; it’s once again proven to be inaccurate.

Sadly, most advertisers rely on their bunk of crap, but bloggers all over, are getting screwed on advertising dollars!

For quite sometimes, actually, for over two years that I’ve been blogging, I’ve been watching my Alexa.com stats eroding away. And I’ve been wondering, as to why Alexa.com is showing my blog traffic in decline, while Google analytics on Blogger is showing otherwise, the opposite? I’ve had steady growth throughout the years, but since I’ve been syndicated, I have lost that increase I used to have, I’ll admit it’s a little slower now.

Three years ago, Alexa.com had me rated at best, top 76,000 blogs in the U.S. and as high as 140,000 worldwide, and, get this! That was one year into my blog! 

And now, three years later, when the Marc Chamot Report is well established, and numerous contents syndicated all over, and they’ve got me at horrid 1,963,827 in the world!

Google Blogger shows otherwise;

 Alexa says, they measure blog traffic by people who have the alexa.com toolbar on their browsers, who actually access your blog.

However, most people I know, don't even know what Alexa is, and much-less having their freakin' toolbar on their browsers!

Well, I am not very happy about it, so I will voice my concern. However, syndications do hurt blog traffic, and there’s no question about it.

Partial list on impressions:

If you want something new, and that is way more reliable than Alexa.com, try klout.com.

Klout is way more accurate, and they don’t measure your blog by traffic alone, but they also look at how influential you are through other means, such as Twitter, Facebook and Blogger.

Klout ranks you accordingly, unlike Alexa.com, who doesn’t have any WIDGETS in my blog, or anybody else’s to accurately measure yours and my TRUE blog traffic.

That’s where klout.com comes in. They measure your influence in other ways, other than who reads your blog. My klout page has me scored at 44 out of a possible 100 in web influence, and that’s with limited Facebook options that they haven’t finished!

And wait till they do search engines! Ay caramba! Just imagine what your stats would be then?

So, if you want to accurately measure, and see who’s really influential? Forget those phony Alexa.com stats, just go with klout!

Read more about Alexa.com innacuracies: in Alexa is Becoming Completely Worthless “Alexa is becoming a joke lately. Some people claim that over the previous two years it was already losing reliability, but lately it went completely nuts. Whatever they did on the last algorithm update, it messed up their rankings badly.

I know that many people already ignore Alexa, but most advertisers still consider it when evaluate ad buys on websites, so I think we need to raise the awareness about it, and encourage them to use other available tools to gauge traffic.

The problem emerges when you make comparisons of different websites, and when you bring into the picture other traffic tracking services like Compete.com or Google Trends. I have 5 interesting cases to illustrate this.

Case 1: Daily Blog Tips vs. Daily Writing Tips

This was a natural example since I own both sites and have access to the real traffic figures. Daily Writing Tips (as of today) has an Alexa rank of 91059. Daily Blog Tips has a rank of 112363. The Alexa graph of the reach of both sites tell a similar story:

So if one was to trust Alexa, he would conclude that Daily Writing Tips is getting a lot more traffic than Daily Blog tips right? Wrong!

In fact it is exactly the opposite, Daily Blog Tips generates around 15,000 daily page views, while Daily Writing Tips only 8,000. The proportion of unique visitors is similar.

Now the interesting thing is that both Compete.com and Google Trends show a very similar traffic trend for those two sites, and one that is much closer to the real numbers.”

Ohio Craigslist Killer; Richard Beasley Kill Count # 3

New Bodies Found Could Bring Craigslist Ad Death Toll to 3  
From Fox News


Primary RULE Concerning GREED was ignored here; "If it's TOO GOOD to be TRUE, it USUALLY is.


& you MUST take Craigslist more seriously, as if your life is at stake, my friends"-Marc Chamot
"The discoveries of two new bodies could bring to three the death toll from a Craigslist ad that police say lured victims into a lethal robbery scheme.

A body found Friday in a shallow grave near a mall in Akron may be that of a missing man who answered the ad, the FBI said. And a sheriff in a rural county said later in the day that the body of a white male without identification was found in a shallow grave about 90 miles away.

The FBI is working on the supposition that the body found near the Rolling Acres shopping mall in Akron may be that of 47-year-old Timothy Kern, who hasn't been seen in more than a week, agency spokeswoman Vicki Anderson said.

"do we think it might be? Maybe," Anderson said. "He's missing. We haven't been able to find him. It could possibly be, but we just don't know that yet."

Anderson declined to specify how authorities discovered the body.

Kern, of Massillon, answered the same ad for a farm hand that authorities say led to the shooting death of Norfolk, Va., resident David Pauley, 51, in a rural area south of Akron. A South Carolina man reported answering the ad and being shot Nov. 6 but escaping.

Noble County Sheriff Steve Hannum is under a judge's gag order and can't comment on the case, but the title of his emailed announcement late Friday -- "second body" -- implied the discovery was connected with Pauley's death.

Neighbors where Pauley's body was found last week and the second body was found Friday said police had been in the area and a helicopter had been overhead most of the day but the scene was quiet late in the day.

Two people from the Akron area are in custody: a high school student who has been charged with attempted murder and 52-year-old Richard Beasley, who is in jail on unrelated charges.

Beasley's mother has said he has "a very caring heart" and she prays that newspaper reports he is a suspect are wrong.

FBI agents have contacted people to check on their well-being, FBI spokesman Harry Trombitas said Friday in an email.

One was Heather Tuttle, of Ravenna, who applied for the job Oct. 7 but never got a response. She had forgotten about the posting until an FBI agent called and left a message for her Monday.

When she called back, she was stunned at what the agent told her.

"It could have been me," said Tuttle, 27, who has since taken work as an assistant manager at a gas station.

"When the situation was explained to me, it just instantly made me sick and made me realize how lucky I am that I didn't get a response back," she said.

Another man who responded to the ad has said he met Beasley at a food court at a different mall in the Akron area on Oct. 10. Ron Sanson was told the man was looking for an older, single or divorced person to watch over a 688-acre (280-hectare) farm in southeast Ohio -- the kind of man, Sanson said, whose disappearance might not be quickly noticed.

Sanson and Kern are both divorced. So was Pauley.

Sanson, 58, said he filled out an application and talked for about 20 minutes with Beasley about a $300-a-week job overseeing a swath of land a mile from the nearest neighbor and living rent-free in a two-bedroom trailer with opportunities to hunt and fish and free access to ATVs and snowmobiles.

The farm advertised on Craigslist does not exist; the area where the bodies were found in Noble County is property owned by a coal company and often leased to hunters.

Law enforcement officials have released few details because of the gag order. Hannum, the sheriff in Noble County where Pauley and the South Carolina man were shot, previously said it was unclear how long the ad was online or whether there were other victims.

U.S. Employers Wanton Discrimination towards America's Unemployed & KUDOS to Alabama for Passing America’s Toughest Illegal Immigration Law!

If you’re Unemployed, No Need to Apply; Sorry U.S. Employers Wanton Discrimination towards America's Unemployed & KUDOS to Alabama for Passing America’s Toughest Illegal Immigration Law!

By Marc Chamot

Americans fighting back!

Kudos to Alabama! Most Americans are getting FED-Up with illegal immigration's. According to recent Newsmax.com polls, out of 126,476 poll takers, 78% don’t support President Obama’s amnesties for illegal immigrants, and most want tougher legislation towards rampant illegal immigration in this country.

It's basically like this; the U.S. Supreme Court have said, if immigration laws are on Federal books, states have every right to enforce them, whether the Feds do or not.

There’s no question that recent Supreme Court’s rulings, upholding Arizona’s anti-illegal immigrants hiring employers and E-Verify laws, was a big blow for Obama Feds on being able to fend off states from pursuing their own enforcements of Federal laws, that Feds aren’t in compliance on enforcing.

Numerous polls have shown that majority of American voters, support Arizona’s get tough on illegal immigrants as well as Alabama’s new stricter policies.

“The measure will require public schools to determine the citizenship status of students -- a provision not included in an Arizona law that has been at the forefront of actions by several states to curb illegal immigration.

Under the Alabama law, police must detain someone they suspect of being in the country illegally if the person cannot produce proper documentation when stopped for any reason.

It also will be a crime to knowingly transport or harbor someone who is in the country illegally. The law imposes penalties on businesses that knowingly employ someone without legal resident status. A company's business license could be suspended or revoked.

The law, which is scheduled to take effect September 1, requires businesses to use a database called E-Verify to confirm the immigration status of new employees.

"We have a real problem with illegal immigration in this country," Bentley said after signing the law. "I campaigned for the toughest immigration laws, and I'm proud of the Legislature for working tirelessly to create the strongest immigration bill in the country."

Even though liberals and pro-illegal immigrant groups are calling this law racist, I’m calling it our right to protect our sovereignty, over mass invasions of UNWANTED visitors from the South of the border, who we have to help fund their ‘FREE’ medical, education and welfare, and not counting all the JOBS they steal and lower wages!

If you’re unemployed, there's no NEED to apply. If you’ve been unemployed for a while, and if you are wondering why you’re not getting hired by now, here’s a reason. American employers are wantonly discriminating against the unemployed!

According to U.S.A Today’s Telling the jobless not to apply is plain dopey “With an extraordinary 6.2 million Americans out of work for more than six months, the last thing a person without a job should have to worry about is blatant discrimination against people without jobs. But that's just what has been happening. Businesses across the USA are warning in their want ads that the jobless need not apply.

One prominent example surfaced last year, when mobile phone maker Sony Ericsson announced that it was relocating its headquarters — with 180 new jobs — to an Atlanta suburb. A posting for a marketing/public relations job read, in part, "No unemployed candidates will be considered at all." Under fire, Sony Ericsson blamed a recruiter and quickly pulled the exclusion.

But similar ads are cropping up in job postings for everything from restaurant managers to forklift operators to medical device salespersons. An ad last month specified that a pet-sitting service in Woodbridge, Va., would only deign to consider pet-sitting assistants who were "temporarily unemployed," as if no dog could be subjected to a sitter whose skills were not utterly up to date.

Up-to-the-minute skills could be an asset. But knowledge isn't lost overnight. To exclude everyone without a job when nearly 14 million people are unemployed — and 427,000 filed new claims for jobless benefits last week — is just plain dumb.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has received so many complaints about bias against the jobless that officials consider it an "emerging issue." At a commission hearing in February, even industry representatives were hard-pressed to come up with a business necessity that would require such exclusion.

And meanwhile, two states are acting on their own to reverse the trend, a New Jersey law, which took effect June 1, make it illegal to exclude the unemployed in help-wanted ads and carries fines of up to $10,000 for repeated violations. 

New Jersey Assemblyman Peter Barnes told us one reason he pushed for the measure was learning from his constituents that "to not have a job and then see an ad saying the 'unemployed need not apply,' breaks people's spirit." In New York, several lawmakers are pushing a measure that would prohibit employers from denying jobless applicants an interview or a job solely because solely they are unemployed.

Nearly everybody knows people with sterling résumés, great attitudes and top-notch skills who lost jobs through no fault of their own during the Great Recession. Hiring them is like bringing in fresh talent from the bench. To decide, without seeing a résumé or meeting them, that they're all losers does not speak well of a company's ethics or imagination.

While federal civil rights and age-discrimination laws do not specifically protect the unemployed, they do protect, among others, African Americans, Hispanics and workers 40 and older. If a policy affects any of those groups disproportionately, it might be illegal. With unemployment among some protected groups running much higher than the national rate of 9.1%, a policy that excludes jobless people might, in fact, be considered discriminatory.

Critics insist that the New Jersey law lacks teeth and that measures like New York's would only invite frivolous litigation. They miss the point. The value in such measures isn't to encourage hiring-discrimination lawsuits, which are notoriously difficult to win. The value is to give the unemployed a fair shot at earning a job rather than blithely and pointlessly writing them off.”

You know what folks? We don’t have to take this sitting down and it’s time to fight back! We need for someone to establish an Internet database, for us to expose American companies who hire illegal immigrants and for those who are actively discriminating against the unemployed. I am sure that attitudes will change very quickly.

Insensitive to Japanese, Ammiano’s AB 9, the Anti-Bullying Bill, & Jerry Brown’s Loony Tax Proposals; Poll Saying Voters Have No Faith in Obama & GOP Fixing the Economy:

“Telling it like it is;” Insensitive to Japanese, Ammiano’s AB 9, the Anti-Bullying Bill, & Jerry Brown’s Loony Tax Proposals; Poll Saying Voters Have No Faith in Obama & GOP Fixing the Economy:

By Marc Chamot

Dealing with Morons: First of all, Japan is no joking matter! Anyone who pokes fun at Japan ought to be tarred, feathered and fired. There are some crazy Americans out there, who are coming up with their sorry Japanese Tsunami comments; it’s all absurd, thoughtless and tasteless.

Japan is in the midst of a cataclysmic nuclear disaster, millions of Japanese go to sleep every night in fear of radiation poisonings, and then we’ve got foolish Americans like, “Dan Turner resigned just hours after media reports of his comments in a daily e-mail sent on Friday to the governor's staff and other political allies.

According to a recipient of the e-mail, Turner joked that on that day in 1968, "Otis Redding posthumously received a gold record for his single, '(Sittin' on) The Dock of the Bay.'" The e-mail added: "Not a big hit in Japan right now."

Aflac has also fired Gilbert Gottfried, “the comedian who is the voice of the insurer's quacking duck in the U.S. Gottfried, who has voiced the duck in numerous commercials since 2000, posted a string of mocking jokes about the earthquake and tsunami in Japan on Twitter over the weekend.

"I just split up with my girlfriend, but like the Japanese say, 'They'll be another one floating by any minute now," he tweeted Saturday.”

Not only Japan is the butt of jokes, but folks with mental problems are getting hit too. “Rep. Martin Hardy, a Barrington Republican, resigned from the New Hampshire House days after making comments supporting eugenics. Today, Harty, a first-term representative, gave his letter of resignation to House Speaker William O’Brien.

“We both agreed that this is what is best for the House to move forward and focus on critical issues,” O’Brien said. Harty’s resignation will become official tomorrow, and there will be a special election to fill his seat.

The 91-year-old Harty made national news last week when he told a constituent that he supported eugenics to get rid of “defective people.” 

Governor Jerry Brown’s not the BIG Moron he looks; California has the initiative process you know? If Jerry Brown really wanted that tax increase measure, he could bypass assembly GOP, and he could have an independent source go out and get the initiative signature drive for it. But why isn’t he doing it, if he wants that tax increase so badly? Because he knows, Californians aren’t fools that he wants them to be. Who in their right mind would sign a petition to pay more taxes? 

California Gay Assembly member Tom Ammiano is pushing for AB9, the school anti-bulling bill through Sacramento. Good idea! But the problem, the meat of the bill is more about protecting homosexual kids from school bullies. We should have NO tolerance policies on any kind of school bullying, whether someone’s fat, skinny, nerdy, and wearing glasses or speak funny and or they are just red headed.

Problems in 2012, Recent Polls show voters have no faith in President Obama and with GOP/Republicans, in turning the bad economy and lackluster job situations around. “The Democratic president still does better than Republicans: When asked who has a better vision for the years ahead, 45 percent of poll respondents chose Obama and 33 percent picked the Republicans.

“He was promising change,” says poll participant Jessica Wolf, 20, who attends Ivy Tech Community College in Lafayette, Indiana. “I haven’t seen any change. There are no jobs out there for us.”

The poll’s findings underscore the difficulty Obama faces in convincing voters he can boost employment and cut the deficit. The public’s perception of his ability to implement an effective strategy to improve the nation’s long-term prospects is likely to be one of his top hurdles to re-election.”

Telling It Like It Is!

Telling it Like It Is! New changes on this blog:

Time is a killer for most independent bloggers like me. So much is happening around the world and all over, but there’s no time to cover it all.

Ever since I created the Marc Chamot Report, I have been able to make it into a successful and workable blog as is. But somehow, this one has been neglected.

So what’s going on with this blog? I have decided to use this blog as a column, reporting different news events and then opinion on them, all under one posting every week. My other blog delves more on political issues that affects us all and it is in more detail.

This one will be brief, about subjects that interest me and my opinion. I will try to cover more San Francisco and California news since I live here.

I will also use my signature title that I once had, when I published a newspaper many years ago. It will be preceded by “telling it like it is.” I will become free and personal on every posting and that’s a guarantee.

Thank all you for reading my blogs.

Best Wishes,

Marc Chamot